Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)
- Reply: estrabd : "Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)"
- In reply to: estrabd : "Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 19:36:41 UTC
On Sat, 6 Sep 2025 12:55:21 -0500 estrabd <estrabd@gmail.com> wrote: > At least one of the individuals I saw on that Git dev email list being a > proponent for Rust is someone I worked personally with as a Perl > programmer, and he's one of the best Perl programmers I know. He's arguing > *in favor* of Rust being used with git. So the 2 are not mutually > exclusive. The Perl community is still extremely active and still very much > alive, but one thing that really gets my feathers ruffled is when Rust > people (in particular) throw shade in our direction. Please don't try to > draw others into this, no Perl programmer I know has even batted an eye > about this. How it pertains to FreeBSD is another issue entirely, so let's > stay on target. I know some Perl programmers loving Rust, too, but en masse still view this as contradictory and unusual for Perl community to promote Rust which has very different values than Perl. One of that values, shared by also both C and FreeBSD, is stability. And for example, as for VCS, the author of SQLite and Fossil DVCS, tells in https://sqlite.org/whyc.html that Rust, in it's current state, is unsuitable for thsese projects, in particular due to stability and support. Even myself had bad exeprience when I was in need to compile older Firefox 126 in March and this was not doable in host system (so I need to create jail with 9-months-older ports) due to Rust crates in that FF were compilable by Rust 1.78 but broken with Rust ~1.82 - same code, just few minor versions! So it could be forecast this would be maintenance nightmare, especially given FreeBSD major branch support times. -- WBR, @nuclight