Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)"
- Reply: Vadim Goncharov : "Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: Git haas gone wild (Rust)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 18:37:22 UTC
On 9/6/25 08:47, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2025, 7:39 AM Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net <mailto:eugen@grosbein.net>> wrote:
>
> 06.09.2025 20:17, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > Am 05.09.25 um 18:42 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> you might want to enjoy or discuss: https://lore.kernel.org/ <https://lore.kernel.org/> git/20250904-b4-pks-rust-breaking-change-v1-0-3af1d25e0be9@pks.im/T/#t <http://20250904-b4-pks-rust-breaking-change-v1-0-3af1d25e0be9@pks.im/T/#t>
> >>
> >> Michael
> >
> > This poses a bootstrapping problem, (if we need Git to get the Rust build for ports... there's a chicken-and-egg problem)
>
> Maybe it is time for us to bring net/gitup into base system.
> It's written in pure C and comes under BSD2CLAUSE license.
> Also, it matured over many years and runs just fine.
>
> For the reference: https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup <https://github.com/johnmehr/gitup>
>
>
>
> Got is better supported and wouldn't be an instant burden.
>
> Warner
>
>
fuz@ and I discussed this a little bit yesterday, too. I think it'd be fine to introduce got if we have
a simple wrapper to checkout (and maybe update) a repository in a git-compatible way so that one could
easily migrate between the two. Something like: clone the repository to /usr/{src,ports}.git, checkout a
worktree to /usr/{src,ports}, then add a git-style .git symlink to point back to the appropriate .git dir
so that git recognizes it as a worktree.
git itself can create an identical layout with `git clone --separate-git-dir=/usr/src.git ...`
Thanks,
Kyle Evans