Re: Renaming O_NAMEDATTR to O_NAMEDSTREAMS Re: Size of "alternate data streams"/"resource forks" / O_NAMEDATTR Re: FreeBSD Status Report - Second Quarter 2025
- Reply: Joshuah Hurst : "Re: Renaming O_NAMEDATTR to O_NAMEDSTREAMS Re: Size of "alternate data streams"/"resource forks" / O_NAMEDATTR Re: FreeBSD Status Report - Second Quarter 2025"
- In reply to: Cedric Blancher : "Renaming O_NAMEDATTR to O_NAMEDSTREAMS Re: Size of "alternate data streams"/"resource forks" / O_NAMEDATTR Re: FreeBSD Status Report - Second Quarter 2025"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 06:24:00 UTC
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 6:34 PM Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com> wrote: [Please keep me in the CC:, I do not get emails from the freebsd-hackers@ list] > > On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 23:12, Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 11:29 AM Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 at 12:54, Lorenzo Salvadore <salvadore@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > The top level system call interface is open(2)/openat(2) with the new > > > > O_NAMEDATTR flag (called O_XATTR on Solaris). > > > > > > > > Most of the work has been committed to FreeBSD’s main for FreeBSD 15. Once the > > > > ZFS patch makes it through review and gets pulled into OpenZFS, the ZFS and > > > > NFSv4 support should work. There are also a couple of manual pages currently > > > > under review in phabricator. > > > > > > > > The main thing left to do is update libarchive/tar so that large extended > > > > attributes can be archived/retrieved. (The current FreeBSD extended attribute > > > > mechanism is supported by libarchive, but will have size constraints.) > > > > > > 1. There are no size constraints. The main problem is different: > > > SUN's original name is both a misnomer, and was hijacked by Linux to > > > stuff in their broken clone of Windows extended attributes. > > > > > > The O_NAMEDATTR/O_XATTR files are in fact "alternate data streams", > > > like on Windows, macOS (which calls them resource forks), and > > > mainframe operating systems. > > > They can have unlimited size (like the "main" data stream), and can > > > even be sparse (SEEK_HOLE&friends). These are very different beats > > > from "extended attributes". > > > > > > Background: > > > Early versions of Windows started with EA (extended attributes), and > > > then Windows NT4 adopted alternate data streams as a superior super > > > set of the EA. Windows just couldn't get rid of the EAs, so they (and > > > their evil Linux xattr clone) and their limitations keep haunting us. > > > > > > Funny is, EAs in Windows are nowadays just emulated via alternate data > > > streams (stream "$EA" is the index, stream "$EA_INFORMATION" has the > > > raw data). > > > > > > 2. Look at Solaris tar, which can handle unlimited size of O_XATTR streams > > It might be possible to put Solaris tar (from OpenSolaris) in ports. > > I'll put it on my (currently rather long) todo list, unless someone > > else is inspired > > to look at it? > > > > As for libarchive, there are two problems: > > - The way it is structured, it generates a linked list of a file's > > extended attributes. > > As such, it is possible for very large ones to run into malloc() > > failures (aka ENOMEM). > > To fix this would be a major re-write of libarchive, so I do not see > > that happenning. > > - The other is that it currently uses > > extattr_get_file/extattr_set_file, which copies the > > entire attribute in one syscall. This actually works for ZFS > > locally, but will not work > > for NFSv4.2 because there is a limit (currently a little over > > 1Mbyte) on RPC message > > size. > > --> This should be fixable via a patch that replaces the above > > syscalls with loops > > on read/write for file systems that support named attributes. > > This is already on my todo list. > > I think the problem here is that people think O_XATTR/O_NAMEDATTRS are > "attributes". Which implies a short amount of data, which is > ABSOLUTELY NOT THE CASE!! > > Maybe O_NAMEDATTR and O_XATTR should be renamed to O_NAMEDSTREAMS > (plural!), as a clear and present warning that this stuff can store > lots of data? I like the idea, because it fixes the problem that the |O_ATTR|/|O_NAMEDATTR| are treated like attributes, while SUN's intention was to implement "Alternate Data Streams" (which is a superset of "extended attributes" as seen in Win32 EA and Linux XATTR, but with none of their limitations and problems) for Windows, MacOS, VMS and mainframe OS support. Re Plural: NO, please read openat(2): You open ONE named (attribute) stream by passing this flag and the name, or the index (dir) by passing "." as name. One attribute == Singular. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)