Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?
- Reply: Cedric Blancher : "Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?"
- Reply: Lionel Cons : "Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?"
- In reply to: Cedric Blancher : "FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:49:45 UTC
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 2:09 AM Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good morning! > > Does FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd support named attributes (e.g. OPENATTR), > per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5661#section-5.3 > > ZFS and Solaris UFS support named attributes (via O_XATTR), does > FreeBSD do it too? No. fork files/resource forks (or whatever you choose to call them) have been discussed multiple times. If I recall correctly, one showstopper was fixing the archive tools. There was also the generic argument that Linux doesn't support them. Then there was the issue of what VFS/VOP changes were required. (The FreeBSD VFS carries vnode locks across VOP calls and is at what I would call a lower level than Solaris.) --> Which all comes down to who will do the work? If I recall correctly, there was a time when a group associated with CERN needed them to transition away from Solaris. Anyhow, maybe the discussion will happen again here and now, rick > > Ced > -- > Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com> > [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/] > Institute Pasteur >