Re: Non-root chroot
- In reply to: Dmitry Mikushin : "Re: Non-root chroot"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 15:37:46 UTC
Thanks, that's a much more complete explanation than I've been able to find elsewhere. So this would need to be coupled with a jail break to have any impact on the host, but that's apparently not difficult either. On 8/1/25 07:38, Dmitry Mikushin wrote: > The fundamental security concern with allowing unprivileged chroot() is > *privilege escalation through file system manipulation*: > > 1. A regular user creates their own directory structure in their home > directory (where they have full write permissions) > 2. The user creates a fake |/etc/passwd| file within this structure, > containing a password hash for root that they know > 3. The user then chroots into this fake filesystem > 4. Inside the chroot, when the user runs |su| (or similar > authentication utilities), these programs read what they believe is > the system's |/etc/passwd| file - but it's actually the attacker's > crafted version > 5. The |su| command validates the password against the fake password > file and grants root privileges > > > пт, 1 авг. 2025 г. в 14:20, Jason Bacon <bacon4000@gmail.com > <mailto:bacon4000@gmail.com>>: > > > I'm wondering if there is any way to perform a simple chroot without > having root privileges. The goal is to test software builds with > access > to a limited set of dependencies, as poudriere does, but outside the > FreeBSD ports system, and in some cases on hosts where the user has no > root access. This will prevent configure scripts with hard-coded > search > paths from finding things we don't want them to find. Portability to > other POSIX platforms would be desirable as well, but is not essential. > > It's not clear to me why chroot() wasn't designed to support this use > case. There's lots of documentation stating that it's a security risk, > but I don't see why it couldn't have been designed to be run by a > regular user without escalating privileges inside the chroot. I.e. if > user "joe" does such a user-level chroot call, then all chrooted > processes run as "joe", but with the path of the chroot dir > prepended to > every open() call (after $CWD is prepended to relative paths, of > course), so that processes can only access files in the chroot dir. > User "joe" would have the same privileges inside the chroot that he has > on the host. One of the other security concerns mentioned is jail > breaks, but if joe managed to escape the chroot, he'd only be hurting > himself by borking the test build, so that's not a concern here. > > It might be possible to port fakechroot > (https://github.com/dex4er/fakechroot <https://github.com/dex4er/ > fakechroot>), proot > (https://github.com/proot-me/proot <https://github.com/proot-me/ > proot>), or something similar, but is there > anything else on FreeBSD that can do this? > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Life is a game. Play hard. Play fair. Have fun. > > -- Life is a game. Play hard. Play fair. Have fun.