Re: Forgotten MFC
- Reply: Artem Bunichev : "Re: Forgotten MFC"
- Reply: Dag-Erling_Smørgrav : "Re: Forgotten MFC"
- In reply to: Artem Bunichev : "Re: Forgotten MFC"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 10:28:51 UTC
Am 2025-04-12 12:46, schrieb Artem Bunichev: >> Me, too, not a developer, but you need to specify which commit you >> mean >> to get answers from developer. > > Sure, here is a commit: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=272b4b764bdfb563f655da37ef9ec8c01c77f386 > > But I would say that I was interested in general approach for MFC'ing, > rather > than a particular case. What I mean is how do developers keep track of > which > commits should be MFC in, say, 14-STABLE, because as I can see, not all > of the > commits in -CURRENT branch include "MFC after:" field. There is some code which tracks commits and looks for "MFC after:". It emails the developer when the time has passed. Nothing else will happen in an automated way, no reminder, nothing. Everything else is up to the developer. Source: https://github.com/freebsd/mfctracker Website: https://mfc.freebsd.org/ Regarding how a developer decides when to put a MFC marker or not, is up to them. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF