From nobody Sat Sep 07 22:16:41 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X1SBH3Knjz5TqQ2 for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 22:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from x9k@charlie.emu.st) Received: from f3.bushwire.net (f3.bushwire.net [IPv6:2403:580c:e522:0:203:0:120:11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X1SBC3cFlz49xJ for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from x9k@charlie.emu.st) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=emu.st header.s=2019 header.b=Kp+FUUHK; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of x9k@charlie.emu.st designates 2403:580c:e522:0:203:0:120:11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=x9k@charlie.emu.st Received: by f3.bushwire.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4AF234E670; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 08:16:41 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=emu.st; s=2019; t=1725747401; bh=8Sn7b8CkmKmLZXauggQkD7dg0bg=; h=Comments:Received:From:Comments:Message-ID:Date:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:Mime-Version: To; b=Kp+FUUHKqb1bpYrgzgwFdR+rA9n8gn4T2YUcueCtzI2aKbX2TiBdQaXbo7A2LuPBY ucCkitNY4L9YWfyK7cFOcX2uoXzXWe4TvFICIW7I3fNlkJTouUeo+BICabVy/rI4hD Ae3f7BPmcfEg2kLxyp/w6WTxviPLqPCHlG94y/qU=94y/qU= Comments: QMDA 0.3a Received: (qmail 30021 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Sep 2024 22:16:41 -0000 From: "Mark Delany" Comments: QMDASubmit submit() 0.2.0-final Message-ID: <0.2.0-final-1725747401.247-0x0f62fa@qmda.emu.st> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 22:16:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54eef546-25c7-452a-ab52-7e39b133cdee@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma? References: <0.2.0-final-1725702660.839-0xb11c62@qmda.emu.st> <54eef546-25c7-452a-ab52-7e39b133cdee@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.11 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[emu.st:s=2019]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.985]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.31)[-0.310]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2403:580c:e522::0/48]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4764, ipnet:2403:5800::/27, country:AU]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[emu.st]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[emu.st:-] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X1SBC3cFlz49xJ On 07Sep24, Stefan Esser apparently wrote: > Am 07.09.24 um 14:18 schrieb David Chisnall: > > Does AFP still work with newer versions of macOS? I thought they removed support for it with APFS. > > I have both Samba and NetATalk installed and running on my home-server. > BTW: vscode on the MacBook does not work well on directories > exported using netatalk. Every "file safe" operation warns that the > target file had been modified and asks for confirmation to overwrite > it. Indeed. Just so it's clear, I was only addressing the question on the subject line. That of providing just a TM service. As Stefan points out, Samba is likely to be a better choice if additional file system services are required. One presumes that if TM doesn't work with current Samba it should be possible to run both Samba and netatalk together, but I have not tried this. Mark.