From nobody Sat Sep 07 17:49:10 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X1LFb0NMlz5WBYL for ; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 17:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from x9k@charlie.emu.st) Received: from f3.bushwire.net (f3.bushwire.net [IPv6:2403:580c:e522:0:203:0:120:11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X1LFX0V82z4XgN for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 17:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from x9k@charlie.emu.st) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=emu.st header.s=2019 header.b=gZjx0x82; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of x9k@charlie.emu.st designates 2403:580c:e522:0:203:0:120:11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=x9k@charlie.emu.st Received: by f3.bushwire.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 711BA4E670; Sun, 08 Sep 2024 03:49:10 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=emu.st; s=2019; t=1725731350; bh=4hUATgWU2kYMNaT7hRaeV6flNBg=; h=Comments:Received:From:Comments:Message-ID:Date:To:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Subject:References:Mime-Version; b=gZjx0x82QDFTdC8VT88YIDPVGGvk8kqxIpxNrHPCAxa/fX8kRuo4qpoch8kNEFrBX tQhEd3mRrrhuvPcLfKwpFVrswc//ZW4+D+0lN5ND0hhhxo9q69HFx7iEbAT+reik83 rGmoDjg0tYdOiH0osZeFuakF1EfvXjBJprbCDv+Y=CDv+Y= Comments: QMDA 0.3a Received: (qmail 28260 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Sep 2024 17:49:10 -0000 From: "Mark Delany" Comments: QMDASubmit submit() 0.2.0-final Message-ID: <0.2.0-final-1725731350.405-0x98b0ab@qmda.emu.st> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 17:49:10 +0000 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma? References: <0.2.0-final-1725702660.839-0xb11c62@qmda.emu.st> List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.23 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[emu.st:s=2019]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.983]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2403:580c:e522::0/48]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.19)[-0.186]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4764, ipnet:2403:5800::/27, country:AU]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[emu.st]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[emu.st:-] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X1LFX0V82z4XgN On 07Sep24, David Chisnall apparently wrote: > On 7 Sep 2024, at 10:51, Mark Delany wrote: > > > > I'm going to ask a silly question here. But why are people running samba instead of > > netatalk if they are only using the timemachine backup capability? > > Does AFP still work with newer versions of macOS? I'm doing timemachine backups from Sonoma 14.6.1 to afp. It would be a pity if they did remove that support. FWIW. My rc.conf <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< avahi_daemon_enable="YES" netatalk_enable="YES" # conf=/usr/local/etc/afp.conf dbus_enable="YES" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and afp.conf <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< [Global] afp listen = 10.1.0.4 fd2d:e363:95de:fe:10:1:0:4 hostname = HomeServer guest account = nobody [dog] path = /backups/timemachine/dog time machine = yes vol size limit = 1000000 valid users = dogafp [cat] path = /backups/timemachine/cat time machine = yes vol size limit = 1000000 valid users = catafp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With dogafp and catafp set in /etc/passwd Mark.