Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)

> While I think I agree with the arguments against including Rust, there are programming languages that make it
> really hard to manage the possible interactions between components and hence expose you to security issues.
>
> C is the “rust golden” example. Complexity can become unbearable and it can be compared to programming in assembler. ;)
>
Common argument from people that cannot program.
How nice i don't have to interact with such, as i switched completely to 
embedded programming (real embedded, not pseudoembedded like raspberry 
pi).

But still - i will need for many years UNIX that make sense. As well as 
for providing services to support my and other works, communicate etc.