Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 04:24:49 UTC
Warner Losh wrote: > Why is the rust binary so much larger? Are the rust runtime and > dependencies statically linked? > tl;dr yes: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/linkage.html At least in ports, we're generally not packaging anything other than --crate-type=bin (executable). Individual crates are free to set output crate types, especially when producing an executable, but most will leave the crate_type attribute unspecified in Cargo.toml to let rustc/cargo perform the most appropriate actions. In this case, a series of rlibs are produced for the final link into an executable. Someone did up an explainer on size minimisation: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust In ports, we already use the Release profile, strip symbols, enable LTO when not unsafe and set the Rust equivalent of -O2 (default in Release profile is -O3). -- Charlie Li ...nope, still don't have an exit line.