From nobody Sat Aug 03 04:13:05 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WbTp11xxTz5Rtlv for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2024 04:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:7400:8808:123::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WbTp04zymz4NDY; Sat, 3 Aug 2024 04:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Catflap-Envelope-From: X-Catflap-Envelope-To: asomers@FreeBSD.org Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 4734D5rA042999; Sat, 3 Aug 2024 05:13:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 4734D5gd042998; Sat, 3 Aug 2024 05:13:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <202408030413.4734D5gd042998@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 05:13:05 +0100 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, asomers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: ACLs on fusefs References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]); Sat, 03 Aug 2024 05:13:05 +0100 (BST) X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:7400::/38, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WbTp04zymz4NDY Alan Somers wrote: > TLDR; > how useful would it be if fusefs(4) could support ACLs? I, personally, don't use ACLs generally, so have not missed them on fusefs. However, I do make extensive use of XATTRs, so those are what I've really missed. I didn't know xatrs were now supported - is that a new thing, or maybe the client I use (borgs sshfs implementation) needs to be updated? Cheers, Jamie