Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE
- Reply: George Mitchell : "Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE"
- In reply to: George Mitchell : "Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:42:32 UTC
On 3/22/2023 13:37, George Mitchell wrote: > On 3/22/23 13:10, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> [...] >> I dont even try ULE any more. I just used 4BSD, as did bde@freebsd.org, >> ULE seems to suck when your have interactive use and compute bound on >> the same box. I have seen interactive in the past take seconds to >> echo a command. IIRC ULE and zfs in a memory contrained environment >> dont play nicely togeather either. >> >> +1 on the return to 4BSD as the default scheduler >> > Thanks for the support and confirming I am not crazy! -- George > Am I correct that toggling between these without a kernel build (or even at runtime) is not possible? Been a minute since I've cared.... :-) -- Karl Denninger karl@denninger.net /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/