From nobody Mon Apr 17 11:53:31 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Q0QSD4fgWz45nFL for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Q0QSC5mynz3rF9 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net does not designate 2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=grosbein.net (policy=none) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221] (may be forged)) by hz.grosbein.net (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 33HBrcQ7074659 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:53:39 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: Lee.MATTHEWS.external@stormshield.eu Received: from [10.58.0.11] (dadvw [10.58.0.11] (may be forged)) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 33HBralT071571 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:53:36 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: BINIT and BERR signals in MCA To: Lee MATTHEWS , "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org" References: <4bd3e1017a104598ab92e658f25b5367@stormshield.eu> <24a51bf0-71de-f596-ef8b-785da4a27fd7@grosbein.net> <3a5479243699436d86ace8fff20db0ba@stormshield.eu> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <4727b400-c014-9014-9d0b-d4f15fee0e09@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:53:31 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3a5479243699436d86ace8fff20db0ba@stormshield.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT autolearn=disabled version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT No description available. * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on hz.grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.16 / 15.00]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.920]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.24)[-0.244]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[grosbein.net : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[eugen]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Q0QSC5mynz3rF9 X-Spamd-Bar: - X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N 17.04.2023 18:29, Lee MATTHEWS wrote: > The CPU temperature oscillates between 25 and 45 degrees Celsius, with a 10 second measurement interval. > Do you still think that temperature could be an issue? Unlikely. > Do you think defective RAM could produce this problem? It definitely could.