From nobody Fri Nov 04 00:47:11 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N3MQq0Ww3z4hCYR for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 00:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iio7@tutanota.com) Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client CN "mail.tutanota.de", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N3MQn2q1Sz3kYG for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 00:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iio7@tutanota.com) Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021B1FBF92E for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1667522831; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=Nwq0OlFUY5bR5CinpdC7TN51K72yw/OLX1WMCzkHL8o=; b=b4aci28JlbR5wgG05p5B6ryM8PpKVbQna+R9iZbl5fzn3f5YLjzxAytQBN99OOnn xTPsJqqC7dl1wd08ZXH7X2Ff8iheztvq5qeFz9lsKSm2PG1wuPz43k1nwc6DSKY402y DItpvRas2XJGyzbDUDXHw/5rgL7d63HZpV1A0S6z2fun3BPZNjZU6GPJ2VX6GFsdqm9 g5k2Tl1tddH2KraXLcUcfMCxI028ivtcRhLWVu1ck15IOqlDvoYu3R4XZZld1wWNPyq NOw9qeTQx55FOrva9egxvTJIos9hfmNuPQIe4ew08avfl4i/fDmP7XAcX0wZpUKeMpU nS+Ouck/FQ== Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 01:47:11 +0100 (CET) From: iio7@tutanota.com To: Freebsd Hackers Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the status of the FreeBSD development process now? List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N3MQn2q1Sz3kYG X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tutanota.com header.s=s1 header.b=b4aci28J; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=tutanota.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of iio7@tutanota.com designates 81.3.6.162 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=iio7@tutanota.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tutanota.com,quarantine]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:81.3.6.160/28]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tutanota.com:s=s1]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24679, ipnet:81.3.0.0/18, country:DE]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tutanota.com:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N >> In OpenBSD, AFAIK, absolutely no code goes into the project without >> at least 1 other people reviewing it and approving it. This can be >> seen with the "OK" in the commits. > This has been shown to be false: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions/2022-November/002192.html I have just replied to that. It's wrong. Take a look at the OpenBSD commit logs. https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions/2022-November/002211.html We're not talking about ports, the issue is related to the kernel and base, etc. Kind regards.