From nobody Thu Dec 15 01:10:54 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NXZ2B4FZnz4l3WM for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 01:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@crossfamilyweb.com) Received: from mail.dcrosstech.com (rrcs-24-97-5-251.nys.biz.rr.com [24.97.5.251]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.dcrosstech.com", Issuer "DCrossTech.com LLC CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NXZ2B0mqmz3N1G for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 01:11:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@crossfamilyweb.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dcrosstech.com Received: from smtpclient.apple (d138.guest.wifi.crossfamilyweb.com [10.1.8.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.dcrosstech.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 2BF1BYrl084858 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Dec 2022 01:11:35 GMT (envelope-from david@crossfamilyweb.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.priv.dcrosstech.com: Host d138.guest.wifi.crossfamilyweb.com [10.1.8.138] claimed to be smtpclient.apple Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: David Cross List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.4: EFI: geli + UFS won't boot - fix available Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 20:10:54 -0500 Message-Id: References: Cc: FreeBSD Hackers In-Reply-To: To: Andreas Kempe X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20B110) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NXZ2B0mqmz3N1G X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11351, ipnet:24.97.0.0/16, country:US] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N The drafts never made it out, doesn=E2=80=99t seem there is a distinction th= ere > On Dec 14, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Andreas Kempe wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:51:51PM -0500, David Cross wrote: >>>> On Dec 14, 2022, at 12:11 PM, Andreas Kempe wrot= e: >>>=20 >>> =EF=BB=BFOn Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:29:18PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022, 8:10 PM David Cross w= rote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> One would hope. This is now the third time this has been reported. At >>>>> least. I even personally wrote a draft en for it (for 13.1). And 2 oth= er >>>>> ENs yet to see a release, also with bugs and patches and fixes committ= ed to >>>>> -CURRENT >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> EN s are hard to do as a developer. We do very few of them. Since they a= re >>>> hard, I just don't bother. That needs to change... >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> If ENs are difficult to do, would it at least be possible to add a >>> notice under Late-Breaking News with a warning? To me, having a system >>> that won't boot is a quite nasty surprise. >>>=20 >>=20 >> I wrote draft ENs for these already. Give me a few and I=E2=80=99ll send= them on again >>=20 >=20 > Thank you! I misinterpreted you as your drafts having been rejected. >=20 > Best regards, > Andreas Kempe >=20