From nobody Wed Apr 13 08:30:49 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C932B1AF50D1 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markoml@markoturk.info) Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com (mail-ej1-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KdbQV6Fjvz4h7h for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markoml@markoturk.info) Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id k23so2436482ejd.3 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:30:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=q+xcu24s8vM0BMAZg0ZhbV4Nc46tHPYkuZOF1D25jes=; b=jS0/pJkGPCncAu8qWnbknI9mmUnDTodrr398uJnSJG9WQC4XrPwFPoU6W3PVNACI66 nf4FMRQSj4jFHiEY1kMTZZe6QM4F4VMVs54JGmqB4FW5niM2UlZ162qK6PPy52uUvX73 HF6uSw+MvkkJpp4zpdvwblNbbq4EH2KSk7B2SJ3jNPxTcVpJhsKdj39/eoPcWl7WuhMk TZFOjO8+BoxGbV5ek34VW3gHMPXw4m0dnCjYU79X4131bhBJqNdElzEGjm3Oha/xBZKi PuBAM4Ju+cECBpxzNNdmi/Klb5ZGwV8+EWtblKQm7qIBMed0UPgZnK4mHQVkciDXVEKj rGdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ypY76WWHfhVCteca4YpAE0iup4zQAw5hUedVxpuvA0vIdQKVf p9MdJWEt07dHkJx2WMhCMK6c8kiKhsKxoUQA X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB4fFBonYzU4li4fhqNOIwaljDHYoOI77U9lxH1Y/TrOBaod5m1QYX2ARZ7I/8jseZCmjdVg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:ea2:b0:6e8:c968:d302 with SMTP id ho34-20020a1709070ea200b006e8c968d302mr1549277ejc.666.1649838651824; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vps.markoturk.info ([109.60.124.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20-20020a056402431400b00419315cc3e2sm890959edc.61.2022.04.13.01.30.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 01:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:30:49 +0200 From: Marko Turk To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inactive vs ZFS ARC memory priority Message-ID: References: List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oFSxqpjnzRx11do" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KdbQV6Fjvz4h7h X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 209.85.218.50 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of markoml@markoturk.info) smtp.mailfrom=markoml@markoturk.info X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.65 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.40)[-0.404]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[209.85.218.50:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.05)[-0.049]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[markoturk.info]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.218.50:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.60.124.9:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --2oFSxqpjnzRx11do Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:06:55PM +0100, Marko Turk wrote: >=20 > Why is old data in Inactive higher priority than new data in ARC? >=20 I did some more tests, and I can't get ARC to push Inactive out. The only workaround I found is to start a program that allocates a lot of memory, then Inactive is pushed out and ARC is allowed to grow. Is there any other workaround that I can do? Regards, Marko --2oFSxqpjnzRx11do Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhGJv+o0FoHlUFxVJ0ArzBirlGugFAmJWijgACgkQ0ArzBirl GujDMw//VOMtqnfFR4Ygz+jxWSAXQDRnRx1wcAyvjSNFDiAY9uCaujtSVrV2wWcy JbGk+HZoPujhzqrh1M/datY2/I03xyeYzfDwyxcqzg3dG+9u80ZIcVP5gjSNHsI2 Q/qHQkz/PMPYi++bS+jkCE5YUNnl5Jni0biVW/I7EfO1AFr4pIS5RZLWPD+CCri/ ko1wjEJrUMIYvDj1dQNIzON8jupEwXxVEe7Khrb27G2J273Ux3wxxTaYtums9dr6 v9C61MGH8rtsVDl6YSsQoai1sh4NCBl1hffsWJ12pKzqX65yakBbkOl79+maz7kQ tjWtchDRS7vj8pUV9vtrYOvKfebKPHOf+721vzEsmCif6owh0eOrOtOKLcWLnIz8 5iNBocY4CGVxFiFbrGud7JaWd1Dr+tAw7K84haezfHsTcIWOuEK98yTnhm2+sz+K dFpUkJXADGpGVczPmIwvcyEqZVjnK8wDoPoAqvMpeD4oLHktN9k3hcEcmCw45jns h/hIggTdxgLIOm8KFhr6vR6IFqyo2oUGLbp4MHatz/SW6IKo7MI2KVwMdaEpHIJg J/Rk1nPaoDzNG6rn/4VaetfMkCOxBRmaQr8yxYMoW0qmB8KREWzChlMG+tlsA0vq 9jtGXY17NmDkJrGWppXsvv+/xNgFBNaa7OgRvp/uKUZ1a/eH9Jg= =dovg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oFSxqpjnzRx11do--