From nobody Wed Apr 06 20:43:49 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612D21A94AD9; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 20:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost1.sentex.ca", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KYc1X2RkDz4gKb; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 20:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (pyroxene19.sentex.ca [199.212.134.19]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 236KhqDK072088 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:43:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [IPV6:2607:f3e0:0:4:434:73cd:9d42:28ad] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:434:73cd:9d42:28ad]) by pyroxene2a.sentex.ca (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 236Khnm3007273 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:43:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:43:49 -0400 List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: {* 05.00 *}Re: Desperate with 870 QVO and ZFS Content-Language: en-US To: Bob Friesenhahn , egoitz@ramattack.net Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Freebsd performance References: <4e98275152e23141eae40dbe7ba5571f@ramattack.net> <665236B1-8F61-4B0E-BD9B-7B501B8BD617@ultra-secure.de> <0ef282aee34b441f1991334e2edbcaec@ramattack.net> <28e11d7ec0ac5dbea45f9f271fc28f06@ramattack.net> <7aa95cb4bf1fd38b3fce93bc26826042@ramattack.net> From: mike tancsa In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KYc1X2RkDz4gKb X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mike@sentex.net designates 2607:f3e0:0:1::12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mike@sentex.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mike]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f3e0::/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sentex.net]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.782]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs,freebsd-hackers,freebsd-performance]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11647, ipnet:2607:f3e0::/32, country:CA]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[199.212.134.19:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 4/6/2022 4:18 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, egoitz@ramattack.net wrote: >>> >>> WE DON'T USE COMPRESSION AS IT'S NOT SET BY DEFAULT. SOME PEOPLE SAY >>> YOU SHOULD HAVE IT ENABLED.... BUT.... JUST FOR AVOID HAVING SOME >>> DATA COMPRESSED SOME OTHER NOT (IN CASE YOU ENABLE AND LATER >>> DISABLE) AND FINALLY FOR AVOID ACCESSING TO INFORMATION WITH >>> DIFFERENT CPU COSTS OF HANDLING... WE HAVE NOT TOUCHED COMPRESSION.... > > There seems to be a problem with your caps-lock key. > > Since it seems that you said that you are using maildir for your mail > server, it is likely very useful if you do enable even rather mild > compression (e.g. lz4) since this will reduce the write work-load and > even short files will be stored more efficiently. > FYI, a couple of our big zfs  mailspools sees a 1.24x and 1.23x compress ratio with lz4.  We use Maildir format as well.  They are not RELENG_13 so not sure how zstd would fair.     ---Mike