From nobody Fri Nov 26 18:24:52 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D67618BEEE9 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J137W6vgbz3kJp; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 1AQIOrJa025805; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:24:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 1AQIOq0Y025804; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:24:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202111261824.1AQIOq0Y025804@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX In-Reply-To: <202111261818.1AQII0Ep077479@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:24:52 -0800 (PST) CC: Baptiste Daroussin , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Ed Maste , FreeBSD Hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J137W6vgbz3kJp X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > -------- > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 09:09:54AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > You can disagree with my assertion, but I shall continue to assert > > > that it *seems* as if rather than adding B O S to the CI > > I dont know how long time B-O-S runs these days, it used to take > a couple of weeks, and I have a hard time squaring that with any > contemporary use of the "CI" paradigme :-) Dexter can provide an exact number, but IIRC on his purpose built test box it is on the order of 2 or 3 days. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org