Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX

From: Ed Maste <>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:16:37 UTC
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:52, Eugene Grosbein <> wrote:
> 26.11.2021 4:45, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > We've grown enough C++ support this is likely sane.
> How embedded-friendly is this? I mean a difference in required space for self-contained small file system.
> Comparing with 8.x/9.x, minimal FreeBSD image become pretty big.

I'm not really concerned about this with respect specifically to WITHOUT_CXX.

Of course it's important to support small images, but we need to do so
via pkgbase, nanobsd, etc., rather than poorly-maintained build knobs.
(Knobs like WITHOUT_INCLUDES are built into our make infrastructure,
and are fine.)