Re: got(1) in base consideration

> I've never used got either, but you should be aware that in git
> terminology, “bare” refers to a clone that only has the object store,
> (snip)

Yes, I'm quite versed in git (how it works included) and am perfectly aware of that.  I used "bare" knowingly.

Actually, I've been using worktrees for a long time with bare repositories, where there is no "first"/privileged worktree that has a real '.git' directory, which IMO is much more natural and has the advantage of avoiding foot-shooting if one day you decide to remove some worktree that unfortunately was the main one.
 
> (snip)

True, known.

-- 
Olivier Certner