From nobody Sun Oct 03 08:28:38 2021 X-Original-To: gecko@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CA017DFA93 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HMcSQ3vTTz4fZQ for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C752295C for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1938ScDE037214 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:28:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1938Sc6f037213 for gecko@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 3 Oct 2021 08:28:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258804] www/firefox: 93.0 fails to build on i386 Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 08:28:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: felix@palmen-it.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-gecko List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258804 --- Comment #5 from Felix Palmen --- (In reply to Christoph Moench-Tegeder from comment #3) > "wontfix" upstream, perhaps it's time to get rid of 32bit? If I get that upstream issue correct, it's "wontfix" because they can't see= m to get it correct for all platforms (especially windows) and decided i386 is irrelevant? > I had about the same idea of fixing this, but without relying on the patch > file to be revertable. Well, then it's duplicating code, which could theoretically change when they pull newer versions from FreeBSD. But indeed, a clean revert of a patch in = the middle of a serious isn't guaranteed either. So, both approaches have their cons=E2=80=A6 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=