Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1
- Reply: Wes Morgan : "Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- In reply to: Chris Ross : "Re: Unable to replace drive in raidz1"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 18:35:22 UTC
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 14:21, Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> wrote:
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> tank DEGRADED 0 0 0
> 16506780107187041124 DEGRADED 0 0 0
> 9127016430593660128 FAULTED 0 0 0 external device fault
> 4094297345166589692 ONLINE 0 0 0
> 17850258180603290288 ONLINE 0 0 0
> […]
> % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 /dev/da10
> cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with /dev/da10: already in replacing/spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach’
> % sudo zpool replace tank 9127016430593660128 diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA
> cannot replace 9127016430593660128 with diskid/DISK-ZGG0A2PA: already in replacing/spare config; wait for completion or use 'zpool detach’
Another related question. I can (and just did) “glabel create” so the “new” disk
that is called da10, but is still in chassis drive slot 3 where da3 _used_ to be.
Now the new disk can be descirbed as “label/drive03”. This is what I do with
ext4 labels on Linux machines on similar hardware.
Can I add labels to the ZFS devices without hurting them? glabel says it
overwrites the last sector with label information it manages. Is there space
on a disk that is used entirely for a ZFS device?
- Chris