From nobody Mon Feb 27 23:42:38 2023 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PQcVk3p6Jz3tZMq for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PQcVk2lsxz41Tx for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1677541358; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hqrS+ooUXvKkmDjIoGKBgrvl9W64AKONHeFjWXLfJKU=; b=YqWCPImGmBhFyLtjxNNzsgooDrUHC4NAXgYnH4D13knl11VRRpJfqvgI5tRLpP4dcDHZ3C sT4yoKaSVZVZPdHiXPWaccmPvSEcibYpwzoadjQBB+O+sWWc7PXbSKJu7E0JbBprkC53hW FQlij4o52D9tn27b5e8yHq4CgZlfoceT5DNjhwCgNUp22cPxdv7ybs+4panNzWdqrACHFL omCPAN4x1YOhPQDBrrRot9DWRszoHIKz22GbYkJTIYqBzj7fZ1CwRqntGLDnEvItHI3xfZ kGn2pxqJ2NUNh94uneeZ4lXZlZmz4cFashwm+1n4VCKuC+wjzJ6j46mPT92vKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1677541358; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZnpicK2rscIlYsmdF74lCIfWIrg7rMV4hGdAzZFr8YTunv2fuRaM5JolTP6X7GKLGYe9dW o2zOFKQteWpcy5cwy2pnDR4nPbepXDXKd5IsVjFychg4RfS23O6fBQMmd8jgTrjEgpf9vv BkPdLyXmAAjQ1oUz0ltACjHwGl1FBelbWKhYiokL4hUT//pfN5DHWGD3KGabqNEBwnK75h b4QkhRTcntPsBzshVGYNA9sQa7+RkcuYLMA2sqLBI1v5ig4U9jM+PWdkTPL6ft5jkMfmOH 9y3NTQ8hzUQ9oFcV61tpw1buGYuBr0opT6YQ6tM6UNyRcCqyiTZxtAMWiNNArg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PQcVk1sCfzlqs for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 31RNgcAX024048 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 31RNgcmi024047 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 106107] UFS: fsck_ffs: left-over fsck_snapshot after unfinished background fsck if filesystem clean Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:42:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106107 --- Comment #10 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #9) I expect that the background fsck ran on the system. But by the time I noticed the high % Capacity and then finally noticed the /.snap/fsck_snapshot , I did not find any evidence of a background fsck still being active. This means that I did not see the background fsck run, unfortunately. But the date/time on /.snap/fsck_snapshot made reasonable sense for time frame. My seeing the file indicates that the unlink did not happen by the time I noticed the file. That, of itself, may be odd. (And is what prompted me to submit the note.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=