Re: UEFI question
- Reply: Eric Borisch : "Re: UEFI question"
- In reply to: Alan Somers : "Re: UEFI question"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:50:09 UTC
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 11:42 AM Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:27 AM John Kennedy <warlock@phouka.net> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:32:21PM +0200, Julien Cigar wrote: > > > I have a Dell R340 server on which installed a 13.0-RELEASE and then > > > upgraded to 13.1-RELEASE (through freebsd-update). ZFS is used > (raidz2). > > > > > > The system has the following partitions: > https://gist.github.com/silenius/2defdd5480c5c1bc9ba2ff8940756466 > > > Some things regarding UEFI are not clear to me: > > > - as you can see in the partition list, the installer created an EFI > > > partition on all 4 drives, however it looks like only the first one has > > > has been populated (an mounted): > https://gist.github.com/silenius/1220c953f905d868c1615fd0e7122bbf .. why ? > > > - if I understand well if my da0 disk dies the system becomes > > > unbootable ( > https://gist.github.com/silenius/51d202053295270eaaeb2c02316165ee).. > correct? > > > - what's the correct way to fix this? should I newfs_msdos on each EFI > > > partition and copy /boot/loader.efi as /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI? or > > > should I use efibootmgr? > > > > > > Thanks for enlightening me :) > > > > I use UEFI to multi-boot a lot myself, but not through efibootmgr (vs > > picking it via UEFI/BIOS on boot manually). I'm multi-booting windows > > and FreeBSD, so I'm being (justifiably) paranoid, but not based on > > being burnt in recent memory. > > > > Depending on how your system works (drives are enumerated at startup), > > in theory any of your disks could be da0. If you've only got a working > > EFI partition on one, that is probably hedging your bets a bit but yes, > > if that drive died, you'd probably be dead. > > > > In my dual-disk setups, I'd see an EFI and a freebsd-boot (BIOS) > partition > > on both disks, I split my total swap between the two (not mirrored), and > > did ZFS "raiding" (mirroring-ish, usually) across the freebsd-zfs > partitions. > > > > In my case, using the UEFI/BIOS from the motherboard, I could manually > > pick a disk to boot from which let me vet UEFI or ZFS bootblock changes > > for sanity before committing to both. But yes, I'd upgrade them both to > > the same thing once I was sure it would work. > > I just noticed the same problem. For mirrored installs, the > 13.1-RELEASE installer only formats the efi partition on one hard > disk. Shouldn't it do both? > We go back and forth on this question.... I think we should, but others got grumpy when I suggested it. Maybe just all the drives in the zpool used for the BE? Warner >