Re: lang/elixir | v1.13.3
- Reply: Mike Jakubik : "Re: lang/elixir | v1.13.3"
- In reply to: Mike Jakubik : "Re: lang/elixir | v1.13.3"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:03:03 UTC
>> One issue i have with the port, it wants the erlang runtime, but we need the full erlang for our use. Any suggested actions (an option to choose would be nice, i don't want to manually edit your Makefiles)? Hi Mike, there is no difference (other than OTP version) between: erlang erlang-runtime21 erlang-runtime22 erlang-runtime23 erlang-runtime24 lang/erlang *is* erlang-runtime24 atm. Or do you mean, you need erlang-wx, java etc as well? You can re-target the port with ERLANG_VER= ... something else, or modify the post-patch target not to be version-specific. The reason for this apparent hack is that OTP24 compiled beam files are not compatible with OTP21 beam file opcodes any more. So we need to make sure that people who want JIT-enhanced OTP run with the OTP release that we built against, and that people like me who run multiple erlang-derived apps, each embed the path internally. A+ Dave