Re: Feb 19 meeting actions, discussion, notes, and recording

thanks Gleb,

Yes you're right, the list is low traffic. I've wondered why this is. It's
honestly always been that way.

I wonder if it's because these areas are generally well-understood and so
there aren't a lot of questions. ANd also, since the WG is not your typical
developer-oriented WG, we don't see the typical discussion around code and
approaches....

IDK, just throwing out some ideas.

But I'm more than happy to support this group in whatever ways folks think
make sense

---
Greg Wallace

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:41 AM Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 7:31 PM Greg Wallace <gwallace@netactuate.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Options:
> >
> > Keep it as is and use the WG meetings as a way to track progress and
> identify additional areas that need work
> > Break it up into a few more focused areas, e.g.
>
> Speaking of the mailing list, I think we certainly should keep things
> as they are, because even with all these areas the list is still quite
> low-traffic.
>