Re: Proposed revision of freebsd.org
- Reply: Mark McBride: "Re: Proposed revision of freebsd.org"
- Reply: devnull : "Re: Proposed revision of freebsd.org"
- In reply to: Mark McBride: "Proposed revision of freebsd.org"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 23:34:10 UTC
I like it! One area that might need some focus is making sure it's accessible for blind or low-vision users. -- Rebecca On 5/14/25 08:46, Mark McBride wrote: > Hello, > > I've been working on mock up of what a revised project front page > might look like with feedback from folks on IRC and Discord and I'd > like to see if there is project interest in pursuing it: > > https://freebsd.markmcb.com/ > > This has iterated through several concepts over the past 10 days or > so. This version seems to illicit a broadly positive response. Areas > considered key improvements: > > + usability > it is responsive (i.e., works well on mobile or desktop) > UI more consistent with what a user would expect in 2025 > addresses the long-standing text overlap issue > light/dark mode (toggle in footer, high contrast not implemented) > > + new user engagement > ability to distinguish from linux and alternative OSes > less clicks to find a download > dates associated with releases (feels more alive) > exposes -stable and -current > > + existing user engagement > links to beta ISOs and pre-release mail announcements > > + style > removes low resolution header > shrinks low res beastie so it looks higher res (if there's a high > res, I can't find it) > uses official fonts/logos for brand consistency > What this isn't: finished. It is a mock up. So expect: > - style hasn't been applied to all sub-pages > - exactly which links go in header/footer needs consideration > - how search should work is worth discussion > - exactly what goes in "why" could be debated > - languages not accounted for yet > > Feedback I'm seeking is: > 1. Is there any desire to enhance the main page and site in general? > 2. If we were to pursue a refresh, are we willing to go beyond style > and layout? For example, I think there are a few areas that are > fragmented (about/intro/features/newbies) an consolidation would > enhance their effect. Many other things like this to consider that are > too many to list here. > > Tech notes: > - this is using the existing Hugo back end. The URL provided links to > the generated static files. > - no scripting was added. All changes are HTML+CSS. > - header/footer borrowed and modified from docs.freebsd.org > > Regards, > Mark >