[Bug 282901] find(1): ls(1) equivalent for "-ls" is wrong
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 282901] find(1): ls(1) equivalent for "-ls" is wrong"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 04:57:49 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=282901
--- Comment #5 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug:
URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=4ec46a286b26901d5ee9ac3b405faaa36867e8a1
commit 4ec46a286b26901d5ee9ac3b405faaa36867e8a1
Author: Thomas Eberhardt <sneakywumpus@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: 2024-11-23 16:45:27 +0000
Commit: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2024-12-01 02:46:08 +0000
find: Correct ls(1) equivalent command for -ls primary
After commit 3bfbb521fef5, -g stopped being a no-op. The -g hasn't
been required for equivalent output since 4.4BSD.
PR: 282901
Fixes: 3bfbb521 ls: Improve POSIX compatibility for -g and -n.
(cherry picked from commit b4ede68c21c6c0277bc283c2bda35f3136e836b6)
usr.bin/find/find.1 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.