[Bug 266571] Porter's Handbook: Using cargo: Use Makefile.crates instead of Makefile's CARGO_CRATES

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 19:44:41 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266571

            Bug ID: 266571
           Summary: Porter's Handbook: Using cargo: Use Makefile.crates
                    instead of Makefile's CARGO_CRATES
           Product: Documentation
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Many People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Books & Articles
          Assignee: doc@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: eduardo@FreeBSD.org

Hello,

For some time that Mk/Uses/cargo.mk (.sinclude "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile.crates")
permits using Makefile.crates instead of Makefile to include list of
cargo-crates. This feature has the advantage of having cleaner Makefile and
easier updates with `make cargo-crates > Makefile.crates`.

For what I see, only a few maintainers know about this "hiden" ports framework
feature.

What I propose is to change methodology of rust/cargo ports to include
Makefile.crates.

As an example, we have Makefile PLIST_FILES against pkg-plist and it's very
well explained:

"There is only one case when pkg-plist can be omitted from a port. If the port
installs just a handful of files, list them in PLIST_FILES, within the port’s
Makefile. (...)"

The same could be adapted to Makefile.crates (if/when methodology gets
updated):

"There is only one case when Makefile.crates can be omitted from a port. If the
port uses just a handful of cargo crates, list them in CARGO_CRATES, within the
port’s Makefile. (...)"

Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.