[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in section 10.5.5
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 261814] "union to" should be "union in" in handbook section 10.5.5"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 06:23:16 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261814
Bug ID: 261814
Summary: "union to" should be "union in" in section 10.5.5
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
URL: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/linuxemu/#l
inuxemu-advanced
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Documentation
Assignee: doc@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: pauamma@gundo.com
In 10.5.5. Miscellaneous, "This is, in effect, equivalent to union to file
system mounts." should be "This is, in effect, equivalent to union in file
system mounts." or maybe "union file system mounts".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.