From nobody Sat May 24 19:08:42 2025 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b4Wlf1Q2Sz5wpWB for ; Sat, 24 May 2025 19:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b4Wlf0HTqz3y0j; Sat, 24 May 2025 19:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1748113726; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QHxoglOqK1ZsXFCDJLIFJVV4E0mKNbJz12UvdRcDCNw=; b=FcEJ8G71W/CQ5j1GY6y49q3sZrapCNmMeYR69xShuJAbVSkgDz6VeWmIiWfWUB1qKMcJvk 1fy4PdKfb3i/ZHP0ExBo876mvv/MevA6EYGzgml9UDti3ZisHZuW7vAy1zUTmdxe/Toas2 es+3e5e9tLoCs0lfJQenTkd1vXxiF5+qIPsVxplo4blMv0fwPJ+7+qOFiXiQEygdPmo7lL 3HmWE18fvAmV0V4tQ6XaWEFJciEBp8gcYHsjhTXbyQhDWhaB2qhF7fNQXswST+c4JruXhH Lys4BH2T5DpTDQ/Jh+fkzr+qfSxBMTg0mMfw1x0ICEZVD7bgmf29QkR8N+gbrw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1748113726; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QHxoglOqK1ZsXFCDJLIFJVV4E0mKNbJz12UvdRcDCNw=; b=YDTrTv0Rrzk3uKSOKaTbtNfsc4B0zOwA1rkw/YhGbIZyp9A6yH0FdgzdGUCZOlWz7aPpQ1 Zg8+Vc6QtYOHrXbHyVyT0Luwlt2ygA3QERUwnR40aOXA8ebzZ+FJDgoEGdpUVWJ998v+1N FFN8QqL27DqTSYLSV0mqTBG0d53g3RfsNJeo+KqO/zK44pMCEbW08wHGl9tXxg84foeuCO 75phP71e5JHCxgPhuORw4M5BuOPC3L1BHDPjrROX8FtswQtcVsTgm8JoiQ7lZNZdbuBKUc /11jUKbPm25VzHpDOR8G+e+1OK5byA84Ut6iGwxr7yZMK5R0WQ7Qbm7sxkp9Sw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1748113726; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ULm8Ewf7/gAZNYrhgnlZ1zfDYfBu0uKEM/xua0FFJlFM0SLiWq2IOHtjlPNiNmXFIe39mI 1UicAU2W2D2b18rRZNBUFbU1n9p8UtAh7ZDD2HEeuVv0SU1SrsvCD6o+n1/NwRtgNql9aZ /mR8zT4p/O/XPtZA4An/VcOVhaeVIXr2U5DhhcBIQfm9ngXGgwGwln9UhhWJ6jwlJtP9rv c9/8Bdnc1roej2XXtVKoWoMsqaWIkE8qWjOUTTodx1v/SFELOn9C/+8MWxwxYAre+QirA6 5YiNt9WURFMYIFzSjJJS0XUPBfhhyAuISq/sIs8OI8pOhGJp1vgYxec40H6qMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from cell.glebi.us (glebi.us [162.251.186.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: glebius) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4b4Wld3FZ6z135w; Sat, 24 May 2025 19:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 12:08:42 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Renato Botelho Cc: Adrian Chadd , desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sway not locked after resume Message-ID: References: <9c517ade-a476-456e-9ff0-e9da9948fa7c@FreeBSD.org> <7f7ee3fb-45c9-42e3-85f0-591923717804@FreeBSD.org> <04926fb4-3c40-4245-90e7-49fc6bb8fe21@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04926fb4-3c40-4245-90e7-49fc6bb8fe21@FreeBSD.org> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 02:07:22PM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: R> > R> Sway was consuming 100% CPU and it was indeed fixed by reverting gleb R> > R> changes, but the problem reported in this email is not related and it R> > R> persists. R> > R> > I have pushed eafe5967ac55, that is supposed to fix busdy loop of sway. R> > R> > Can you please confirm that helped and no remaining problems left that R> > depend on me? R> Yeah, it's working very well now. Thank you! The reporter of bug 286692 re-opened it. Sway is again in a busy loop with kevent(2), but slightly different event is reported. Anybody else observing sway consuming 100% CPU after eafe5967ac55? -- Gleb Smirnoff