From nobody Wed May 21 16:47:26 2025 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b2cm23SWZz5wBMl for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4b2cm22lk0z3ZVG; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1747846050; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=plgK2HFKC+EMWvhI6GDSMAvxYg94eDcIP9IIeXJXBqM=; b=FiP88c/cfXdDjqiRSszdYhND9+pC56FhWxjgQio702tEg/BOEm8Qpz97yuQ2wI4jgdV8oK s+UcW5bp1+nWF+FAzazq7P32PXKeXGIQnt6rVZQGPbUCAOyQ5epA0rwUxM3CgZaEsgBW8N kUtkNxt2H0aixWRNLhAlisMjmMYc/IpwzLdZHGDWvlkE0m6xk2Sh2BqTEBXKJ4s3L4Bj3O 54xB3WonLv8hzP7cBpo8qspoRp11buJhHSObBuKVlI/xzHWvODNLe1m48CxRjRMzPCaeW/ y0cq9Xx9kAyRhixV2u9usQWR41q0I9QUY3RD8feltb2t974uxAQBi1M8vK27hA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1747846050; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=plgK2HFKC+EMWvhI6GDSMAvxYg94eDcIP9IIeXJXBqM=; b=HI5KXsnitN1BCP3Hx5yBICcp6uafRpoNzZCpg83mEBJX+vQ+bIAkGRwtkAMoQHe4Nb1qwd Vo1U+zLZAe+zi3VNCob6dWbku51o2j8/vFKvu9opQSRHJVpkVCq6ehFIp1AVhHP4HfSCIV DZWvMZt7rgup1wk77M804hBiCvYNPXbmkP+qbWo0R4qmfrVvH2jFzPqSflvRth0BCIoWnB JujUwxqAiXp4Hi+0UP96kuZ49uEygXkdB7XZAvmEFA6Q2GMfHrcGIAmJGphnAOhHTCOorE koGmnTPUatXXutFqEFv99hZMhxrbWUB1k88JqrX3fHmpL57CcxKKjrvosLr23A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1747846050; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kKn4v6ouHF8+FNYXoh7aChicLj1Uv0fyjdlw9BxA1qzRIgQtsdSRgyiv20R5mlHR3BZusJ QgtiqYdmUMSGTukOH7TyqdmSWioeMqRuweHpyRQlcgZOTw44nrrKMCH/PaMcol6Zs7EFn2 cQ77LOmt7ndZSncAKHVbmyOhmykORGBvlIAauXu6EC0Z9Ch53kVZ59z4xwF3tOPz7eS2sv esqmB+iTs4uN4Sk+ETgDXPrnNPOcQWPCRUyGOmnwnxBfXfNPSj0b4ziKZZ0vZwz+fp8+CL kuCLvtBcsyYBY+EW6kJGOruwB0fSN4Yx8Pd7fILkqoHa30Ck9tfaerf5z7plLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from cell.glebi.us (glebi.us [162.251.186.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: glebius) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4b2cm15XLpz86h; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:47:26 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Renato Botelho Cc: Adrian Chadd , desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sway not locked after resume Message-ID: References: <9c517ade-a476-456e-9ff0-e9da9948fa7c@FreeBSD.org> <7f7ee3fb-45c9-42e3-85f0-591923717804@FreeBSD.org> List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f7ee3fb-45c9-42e3-85f0-591923717804@FreeBSD.org> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:46:24AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: R> On 15/05/25 11:39, Adrian Chadd wrote: R> > Gleb changed some stuff in socket handling, and its broken some bits R> > and pieces that uses unix(4) sockets for stuff. R> > R> > It looks like on IRC that you tried reverting it and it fixed it? If R> > so, can you poke gleb here about it? :-) R> R> Sway was consuming 100% CPU and it was indeed fixed by reverting gleb R> changes, but the problem reported in this email is not related and it R> persists. I have pushed eafe5967ac55, that is supposed to fix busdy loop of sway. Can you please confirm that helped and no remaining problems left that depend on me? -- Gleb Smirnoff