[Bug 266532] x11/lightdm: Login sessions do not respect login.conf
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 266532] x11/lightdm: Login sessions do not respect login.conf"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 19:16:08 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266532 --- Comment #18 from Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #17) > Is POLA include bugs? ) Well actually it could, but that's not the point here. There is no bug. It looks to me you have a very personal definition of bug and of how to "solve" them. > Or these 2 scripts may be distributed separately and sample config may use it by default. Great idea, why don't you file a bug report for anew port which includes these two scripts and all the glue needed to install them? Maybe someone would pick it up (not me, obviously) > sw cursor + heavy load like llvm/chromium compilation. > This is very simple change to improve user experience without any risk of side effects. The point is that changing Xorg priority is not a bugfix, but a local workaround that each user can choose to apply locally, and is not something that we should impose from the official ports. Personally I don't consider what you describe as a bug or even an annoyance. But that's me. > This is very simple change to improve user experience without any risk of side effects. This is your opinion, but is against port rules. Any patch included in the ports tree should also be sent upstream [1] so your proposal of including a patch that is not good enough to be upstreamed is not acceptable by the ports rules. Also not upstreaming patches is a big problem with the ports tree. Differences with upstream accumulate and we are handling ports here, not forks. So yes, if upstreeam has a bug, the bug is expected to also exist in the port. It can be fixed in the port before the upstream but in such a way to be upstreamed. Anyway I'm not considering these scripts for inclusion. I would not feel comfortable committing them. But this will not stop you from writing to the mailing lists or seeking other committer's interest in them. [1] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/#_maintainer_responsibilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.