From nobody Tue Jul 13 05:53:48 2021 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDAD1277D81 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GP8vc1TxWz4hW5 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069851D121 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16D5rl4E092153 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 16D5rlJp092152 for desktop@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 257143] textproc/py-libxml2: Fails to run: libxml2mod.so: Undefined symbol "xmlPopOutputCallbacks" (breaking textproc/itstool -> textproc/gtk-doc / textproc/yelp-xsl Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:53:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status flagtypes.name assigned_to resolution cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257143 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gnome@ | |FreeBSD.org), | |maintainer-feedback?(deskto | |p@FreeBSD.org), | |maintainer-feedback?(kwm@Fr | |eeBSD.org), | |merge-quarterly? | Assignee|desktop@FreeBSD.org |koobs@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |Not A Bug CC| |arrowd@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #6) Unless the symbols in question are only provided in 2.9.10_3, and the ports require those symbols, then yes.=20 However, this appears to be the likely result of a libxml2 shared library A= BI change, without a subsequent py-libxml2 (consumer) shared library update. That can be caused by shared library version changes, without consumer ports having their PORTREVISION bumped, or by modifying port options that change = the shared (libxml2) library ABI, without rebuilding consumer ports (py-libxml2= )=20 The last update to libxml2 was 21 Jun 2021 21:19:10, cc'ing maintainer in c= ase they're aware of possible consumer ports impacts for additional comment, but this appears to be 'not a bug'. Accordingly, closing as resolved given comment 6. Don't hesitate to re-open the issue with additional detail and reproduction steps if that is not the case, or additional changes are required --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=