Re: -current buildworld stoppage
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: -current buildworld stoppage"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: -current buildworld stoppage"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 02:13:37 UTC
On Sun, Oct 11, 2026 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 10/11/26 08:27, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 03:08:18PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> I'm not suggesting drive or cable failures, though I can not rule them > >> out. If you had such, testing the an alternate same type of drive setup > >> that would use the same drivers would be a cross check on such by seeing > >> if only the one device gets failures. (Not that you have the means of > >> doing such testing.) > > > > It isn't obvious how to swap drives without also disturbing cables, somewhat > > invalidating the test. > > No testing is even less information. In general any physical testing > involves multiple subsystems that might be contributing. Testing is > difficult but provides more information. > > > In the past at least a few problems, usually on boot, > > have been seemingly cleared by re-seating USB connectors or microSD cards. > > > > In the last couple of days a string of lines resembling > > find: input/output error <pathname> > > have been showing up in the daily security email. > > > That means EIO (errno 5), if what I read is correct. > > This suggests possibilities: > > ) physical drive failures > ) file system corruptions > ) connection problems > At this point re-seating the connectors looks like a reasonable thing to try. > (No network drive is involved as I understand.) That is correct. > > > Did you check you kernel messages in /var/log/messages* for the right > time frames? (Recent live contexts you could use dmsg -a or the like.) > Even without the detailed time frames for the specific find reports, > finding any appropriate errors over the days is relevant to report. > The machine has been running installworld all afternoon and dmesg is reporting a steady stream of errors but it isn't giving up, for example /usr: inode 84028739: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028739: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028739: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028739: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028744: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028744: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028744: check-hash failed /usr: inode 84028744: check-hash failed /usr: bad dir ino 90930262 at offset 0: mangled entry /usr: bad dir ino 90930262 at offset 0: mangled entry /usr: bad dir ino 90930284 at offset 0: mangled entry /usr: bad dir ino 90930284 at offset 512: mangled entry /usr: bad dir ino 90930284 at offset 0: mangled entry Am I correct in guessing it's succeeding after some amount of re-trying? > Do you have smartmontools installed so that you could do a: > smartctl -a /dev/... or the like? > > I just checked and apparently don't, though I think the drive does support smartmontools. I'll try compiling it after installworld finishes, assuming it does finish 8-) > > The ssh > > window used didn't preserve the lines but I could try to > > save them if it's of interest to anybody. In the meantime > > the machine's been running a -j4 buildworld without disaster, > > no errors on the serial console either. > > > > Thanks for writing, I'll keep poking at the problem(s). > > > > bob prohaska > > > I will note that trying to repair a failing storage subsystem can make > things worse, such as repairing via fsk use. Generally, if there is > evidence of failures suggesting drive replacements, the point is > normally to duplicate to some other media anything that should be > preserved first, instead of disturbing it first. Repair attempts come > after preserving what one can that one wants preserved. > Fortunately this is a test machine so nothing to lose. I did have hopes that it might be backed down to a stable release and used as a nameserver, that plan may have to wait. > For boot media, this normally means no longer booting the media and/oir > having the media as strictly read-only. The usual boot failures seem to be warm (shutdown -r), power cycling always seems to boot hands-off. When boot fails, it's usually a hang in uboot with loss of console control. It looks like the install has finished successfully. What's your guess for the first thing to try? I think mine would be to shutdown to power off, reset the USB connectors and attempt a restart. If something else comes to your mind please let me know! Thanks for writing, bob prohaska