Re: ar: error: libclang.a: 'ParseDecl.o': section header table goes past EOF [So far: unable to reproduce, even based on llvm19 involvement]
- Reply: bob prohaska : "Re: ar: error: libclang.a: 'ParseDecl.o': section header table goes past EOF [So far: unable to reproduce, even based on llvm19 involvement]"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: ar: error: libclang.a: 'ParseDecl.o': section header table goes past EOF [So far: unable to reproduce, even based on llvm19 involvement]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 23:43:29 UTC
On 5/7/26 17:50, Mark Millard wrote: > On 5/7/26 16:46, bob prohaska wrote: >> . . . > > > I'm still no closer to having an idea what else to do for investigation. > So far, you have the only known example failure context. > > I've only had one idea for a very limited test sequence, based on referencing the Parse_ParseDecl.o.meta file: ) Start from a status of already having the bad Parse/ParseDecl.o in place. ) # cd /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/obj-tools/lib/clang/libclang ) # mv Parse/ParseDecl.o Parse/ParseDecl.o.bad (Or analogous. Below presumes that name I listed.) ) Execute the: # c++ -O2 -pipe . . . -o Parse/ParseDecl.o command listed in the Parse_ParseDecl.o.meta file. That command is long enough that simple copy/paste might split the line up into multiple lines. (I've run into such things in various contexts.) So care to get the command right/complete may be needed. The questions for the results are largely based on comparison/contrast with the original bad file: ) Does the command or the console report some sort of message that might be relevant? If yes, what are the details, otherwise conintue. ) Are Parse/ParseDecl.o.bad and the new Parse/ParseDecl.o the same by by size and (most?) content? If yes, you have replicated the problem and report that. (There could be timestamps or uninitialized pad bytes or such complicating the content judgment if the sizes are the same.) ) Is the new Parse/ParseDecl.o big enough compared to avoid the prior error messages? A simple command that would report the too-small size problem would be something like: # readelf Parse/ParseDecl.o readelf: error: 'Parse/ParseDecl.o': unable to continue dumping, the file is corrupt: section header table goes past the end of the file: e_shoff = 0x131190 If it does not produce such an error message, then things are very different. The file might even be correct to continue the build with. Report the status. At some point you will likely want to delete Parse/ParseDecl.o.bad . -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com