Re: we should enable RFC7217 by default
- In reply to: Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani : "Re: we should enable RFC7217 by default"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:37:30 UTC
On 1/27/26 22:15, Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani wrote: > On 1/27/26 4:56 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: >> In a server environment, administrators typically assign static IPv6 >> addresses manually and do not use the EUI-64 method. > To add a note, administrators usually avoid *using* EUI-64 addresses for > production, especially for their DNS records. > However, they often have an EUI-64 address because having default routes > and other parameters automatically configured by accept_rtadv is > convenient. > That's why I believe there will be an impact on servers. however, as you > said, it's not an issue here. > > At least, we use accept_rtadv in our production AND people typically > configure their rtadvd with the autonomous bit. So this results in > having EUI-64 addresses on the servers, which may be used in source > selection. > > I would like to kindly request @madpilot to create this patch for > review, including a note in the UPDATING file, if everyone is in agreement. > I will create a review with this changes soon. But at present my priority is getting the feature MFCed to stable/15 -- Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>