Re: Git balks at untracked files in zfs
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: Git balks at untracked files in zfs"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:50:51 UTC
git clean -x will remove even more gunk. git -xn to see what. > On Apr 25, 2026, at 11:44 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > So first off, do you have files you want to keep? If not, then read on. > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2026 at 11:58 AM bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > For the last few git pull sessions git has been reporting > error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge: > share/man/man4/appleir.4 > sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/hex.h > sys/contrib/openzfs/.github/workflows/zfs-arm.yml > sys/contrib/openzfs/man/man1/dbufstat.1 > sys/contrib/openzfs/tests/zfs-tests/cmd/clone_after_trunc.c > sys/contrib/openzfs/tests/zfs-tests/tests/functional/cli_root/zfs_change-key/zfs_change-key_userprop.ksh > .... and so forth. It looks like all the complaints are about openzfs > > Runnig git reset --hard appears to clear the error: > root@www:/usr/src # git reset --hard > HEAD is now at 2b954770ddd nvme: Use passed in max_pages. > > If I re-run git pull the system reports an update available and fails again: > root@www:/usr/src # git pull > Updating 2b954770ddd..7f207b6443f > error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge: > share/man/man4/appleir.4 > sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/hex.h > sys/contrib/openzfs/.github/workflows/zfs-arm.yml > sys/contrib/openzfs/man/man1/dbufstat.1 > sys/contrib/openzfs/tests/zfs-tests/cmd/clone_after_trunc.c > sys/contrib/openzfs/tests/zfs-tests/tests/functional/cli_root/zfs_change-key/zfs_change-key_userprop.ksh > and so forth. > > It looks like I'm stuck, is there a way to get unstuck? > > git clean -dn > > this will give you a list of files that will be deleted, updated, etc. If the list looks good then > > git clean -f > or > git clean -i > > The former blows everything from the prior step away. The latter asks one by one. If this is supposed to > be a completely clean tree, you can start here. If you have like a kernel config or something, then you'll > want to proceed with caution. > > Warner > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > >