Re: source upgrade of OS leaves pkg using pkg.freebsd.org non-functional
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: source upgrade of OS leaves pkg using pkg.freebsd.org non-functional"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 23:33:40 UTC
Yep I am using what was normal for me a couple of decades ago, portupgrade -aP, until pkg works again. I do a git pull of ports periodically just to ensure I can build pkg and other tools as needed. Brian On 9/9/2025 1:56 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > oid <void_at_f-m.fm> wrote on > Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:31:52 UTC : > >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Lexi Winter wrote: >> >>> yes: ports packages are not available for 16 yet, so you'll have to >>> build from source for now. >> ok, thanks for confirming > Going along with that is that, while, > > https://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/ > > (or other such?) does exist just recently, > > https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/kmods_latest/ > and: > https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/latest/ > > still have not been created (as of when I looked). > > https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:aarch64/ > > is still: "404 Not Found" > > as well (as of when I looked). > > But things are in process and you can monitor > such places that happen to be of interest. > > > Other notes: > > If pkg 2.3.0 ends up being released soon enough, > stopping: > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy18/build.html?mastername=main-amd64-default&build=p118fb2971704_s4ab64e34911 > (or other such main-* builds) > > and running a build based on pkg 2.3.0 may well > take noticable less overall time than letting > the pkg 2.2.2 based build of main-amd64 > port-packkages continue. > > (pkg 2.[12].* and main-*'s debug poudriere jail > combination makes the builds take a very long > time: 240+ Hrs to 480+ Hrs for beefy18 when most > everything is being rebuilt. ampere2 for aarch64 > takes longer.) > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > >