Re: source upgrade of OS leaves pkg using pkg.freebsd.org non-functional

From: Brian <brian_at_sonicboom.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 23:33:40 UTC
Yep I am using what was normal for me a couple of decades ago, 
portupgrade -aP, until pkg works again. I do a git pull of ports 
periodically just to ensure I can build pkg and other tools as needed.

Brian

On 9/9/2025 1:56 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> oid <void_at_f-m.fm> wrote on
> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:31:52 UTC :
>
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Lexi Winter wrote:
>>
>>> yes: ports packages are not available for 16 yet, so you'll have to
>>> build from source for now.
>> ok, thanks for confirming
> Going along with that is that, while,
>
> https://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/
>
> (or other such?) does exist just recently,
>
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/kmods_latest/
> and:
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:amd64/latest/
>
> still have not been created (as of when I looked).
>
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:16:aarch64/
>
> is still: "404 Not Found"
>
> as well (as of when I looked).
>
> But things are in process and you can monitor
> such places that happen to be of interest.
>
>
> Other notes:
>
> If pkg 2.3.0 ends up being released soon enough,
> stopping:
>
> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy18/build.html?mastername=main-amd64-default&build=p118fb2971704_s4ab64e34911
> (or other such main-* builds)
>
> and running a build based on pkg 2.3.0 may well
> take noticable less overall time than letting
> the pkg 2.2.2 based build of main-amd64
> port-packkages continue.
>
> (pkg 2.[12].* and main-*'s debug poudriere jail
> combination makes the builds take a very long
> time: 240+ Hrs to 480+ Hrs for beefy18 when most
> everything is being rebuilt. ampere2 for aarch64
> takes longer.)
>
> ===
> Mark Millard
> marklmi at yahoo.com
>
>