Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf?

On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:05:24 -0400
Matteo Riondato <matteo@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> > On Oct 15, 2025, at 11:16 AM, Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Roger Marquis wrote in <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com>:
> >> I think most of us would define a minimal jail
> > 
> > again -- i appreciate this is not very clear from the package name --
> > the "minimal-jail" set is not "a minimal jail".  it is the "minimal"
> > set, i.e. the set of packages required for a basic multi-user UNIX
> > system, but without packages which don't work in a jail.
> 
> Would calling it “basic-jail” or “standard-jail” (terms used in previous emails on this thread) perhaps be more descriptive?
> 
> Thanks,
> Matteo

I prefer"minimal" here, as term "standard" should be different
case-by-case.

For admins who want to run each services exposing to Internet
to be run on jails "per service", "minimal" is equal to "standard".

But, especially corporate admins who needs "per-emproyee" jails
for security, almost full sets of base plus common-apps-of-the-corporate
ports should be called "standard (of the corporate)".

-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>