Re: June 2025 stabilization week
- Reply: Michael Tuexen : "Re: June 2025 stabilization week"
- In reply to: Michael Tuexen : "Re: June 2025 stabilization week"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:00:37 UTC
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 22:52:48 +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > > > On 24. Jun 2025, at 22:08, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> On 24. Jun 2025, at 21:41, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:28:25PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> M> In /etc/devfs.conf I have > >> M> > >> M> own bpf* root:network > >> M> perm bpf* 0660 > >> M> > >> M> and this results in > >> M> tuexen@epyc:~ % ls -l /dev/bpf* > >> M> crw-rw---- 1 root network 0x27 Apr 26 20:13 /dev/bpf > >> M> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3 Apr 26 20:13 /dev/bpf0 -> bpf > >> M> > >> M> This allows members of the network group to capture traffic. > >> M> > >> M> However, with main-n278173-81e6c0168d46 I get > >> M> tuexen@epyc:~ % ls -l /dev/bpf* > >> M> crw------- 1 root wheel 0x27 Jun 24 12:25 /dev/bpf > >> M> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3 Jun 24 12:25 /dev/bpf0 -> bpf > >> M> > >> M> It looks like the devd did not what it did in the past. > >> > >> I failed to reproduce that on fe55780e5f10, which is very > >> close to 81e6c0168d46. I have what is expected: > >> > >> crw-rw---- 1 root network 0x1d 24 ÉÀÎÑ 12:37 /dev/bpf > >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3 24 ÉÀÎÑ 12:37 /dev/bpf0 -> bpf > >> > > I just tried the updated version of May 2025 stabweek, and that is > > working fine. Let me test fe55780e5f10... > > I observe this problem on an arm64 and on an amd64 system... > fe55780e5f10 show the problem for me: > tuexen@epyc:~ % ls -l /dev/bpf* > crw------- 1 root wheel 0x27 Jun 24 22:48 /dev/bpf > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3 Jun 24 22:48 /dev/bpf0 -> bpf 4deb9760a9d8? Reverting 7faddeb395b7 and 4deb9760a9d8 and running etcupdate seem to resolve the issue.