Re: drm panic after new world
- Reply: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: drm panic after new world"
- Reply: Steve Kargl : "Re: drm panic after new world"
- In reply to: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: drm panic after new world"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 02:29:27 UTC
On 6/5/25 17:18, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:22:45AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> >>> Sorting away wireless changes from sys/compat/.. here's what's left: >>> >>> % git log --oneline adc33d3288..8d136fb027 sys/compat/ | grep -v >>> 802.11 | grep -v skbuff | grep -v wsum | grep -v ASMEDIA >>> 325aa4dbd10d linuxkpi: Introduce a properly typed jiffies << >>> jiffies changed to proper type >>> 8b51cd07f69e LinuxKPI: define time64_t << new typedef >>> 28efbf9d2f67 LinuxKPI: add dummy header file linux/unaligned.h >>> << empty header file >>> e29d72ac3ddd LinuxKPI: pci: add pci_info() << new >>> macro for logging >>> f94d7319540b LinuxKPI: sysfs: implement sysfs_match_string() >>> << new macro/func >>> 6841b9987e83 LinuxKPI: add container_of_const() << new >>> macro >>> 69880fede78f LinuxKPI: extend struct and enum for leds << >>> LED additions to struct/enum (unused) >>> 059136a95aca LinuxKPI: add cleanup.h to mutex.h << >>> #include added >>> 15581af7c2d3 exec: Remove parameter 'segflg' from >>> exec_copyin_args() << linuxolator >>> 97f3a1565d88 linuxkpi: use iterator in zap_vma_ptes << VM >> >> Well, my first attempt was at 6c3a4b5fab, which happens to > > That's not a valid hash. > >> include all of the above commits. I misread the list as >> oldest to newest. Boot system, kldload radeonkms.ko, >> and startx laeds to a panic. The dump_stack() in evergreen.c >> occurs twice. >> >> Just completed rebuilding everything at e1f3f15192c. This is >> the hash tag for the commit prior to 97f3a1565d88 from above. >> This boots up, I kldload radeonkms.ko, and startx brings up >> the expected desktop. > > Do I understand you correctly that the change before 97f3a1565d88 (VM > changes) worked but 97f3a1565d88 fails? > > Or only the former is true and the latter we do not know? > We only know with all of the above it's kaputt but before it's fine? > > >> Looking at dmesg, I see >> >> ... >> drmn0: radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit >> drmn0: radeon: using MSI. >> [drm] radeon: irq initialized. >> #0 0xffffffff808bbcfb at linux_dump_stack+0x1b >> #1 0xffffffff82a67adc at evergreen_startup+0x15ec >> #2 0xffffffff82a67fb6 at evergreen_init+0x276 >> #3 0xffffffff82abdc35 at radeon_device_init+0x835 >> #4 0xffffffff82aceb4e at radeon_driver_load_kms+0x19e >> >> >> and no other mentions of evergreen.c. IOW, initialization >> appears to occur once. > > That sounds good. So no resume path. I almost fear your problem is > outside LinuxKPI but we'll see. > > I'd try 28efbf9d2f67 next to see what happens if I got you correctly. > I've narrowed the range to Good: 2025-04-24 9b2a503a1179 - main - e6000sw: add support for 88E6190X Bad: 2025-04-29 6c3a4b5f9b7b - main - alloca.3: move to share/man/man3 Good means boots and startx does not panic. dump_stack() in evergreen.c reports one initialization event. Bad means boots and startx panics. dump_stack() in evergreen.c shows that radeon is trying to initialized twice. The commit 28efbf9d2f67 is within this range, but I've run out of time until monday. -- steve