Re: CURRENT: kernel panic in IPFW while stopping jails

From: Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher_at_yandex.ru>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 09:28:51 UTC
<blockquote><p>On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 18:30:45 +0100 (CET)<br />Ronald Klop &lt;<a href="mailto:ronald-lists@klop.ws" rel="noopener noreferrer">ronald-lists@klop.ws</a>&gt; wrote:<br /> </p><blockquote> Do you use bpf or tap in your ipfw rules?<br /> A panic with that was mentioned on the 20th. And fixed in the mean time of I<br /> remember correctly. <a href="https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291854" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291854</a><br /> Regards,Ronald</blockquote><p><br />Indeed, all boxes in question do have a tap0 at least defined -but in only one<br />case used.</p></blockquote>Hi,<div> </div><div>I don't think it is related to tap0.</div><div>If it is related to recent BPF changes in ipfw, you can try to remove "log" opcode</div><div>from your rules.</div><div> </div><div>-- <br />WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov</div><div> </div>