Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for non-debug contexts]
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for non-debug contexts]"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for non-debug contexts]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 15:22:55 UTC
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:23:52 -0800 Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > But, as of yet, I've no good evidence for blaming > jemalloc as a major contributor to those timing > ratios --or for blaming any other specific part > of 15.0 . If you want to bench jmalloc - there is another ways to do that without building something. Try to find some sythetic benchmarks. Also jmalloc can be build without OS rebuild and linked with bench. This 2 things can reduce time to tests, but it will eliminate OS integation factors. Run same bench on different OS may give more info.