From nobody Sun Aug 24 14:52:32 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c8xjc5BGMz65Z8F for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:52:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c8xjb50Crz3csS for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm3 header.b=LVIP3PmF; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="b XGbnmR"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.148 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77D2EC0088 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:52:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:52:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1756047154; x=1756133554; bh=vG3ZCBR6aSWrCnVbTfUITLEkLpuQrVJq Q/xkO3sORDY=; b=LVIP3PmFS7rvhSOXZ4guFt+SlkQowe1eXd91hYScWU+/ia7c 3yvLOd+M+eg3XGWOeYp/kAgMH2AmInJ27LbBkF/T358i3eyr/2O21npumqMxGoxY FdGvCJrlfGDrrBujCZbPM2UPYZm5C3AmD0hFTfiJbqEsmFFF0ET0+ahnnQZm8Rwr Gn96iXHGjU87O3hjFdAGA4G71elKvVNpkrl8njTj5uk+ieimP7+ONzp+1URFHoRj ouNFc0ztUvFskmp+IAnZf4l32zJ0Ff7lFfAIA1h3wlD3uaw+JjYUW7lUdXJPaWiv 0p8dORcjzIk4/wZoHO9xt7J71MLOTxuGxXn2OQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1756047154; x= 1756133554; bh=vG3ZCBR6aSWrCnVbTfUITLEkLpuQrVJqQ/xkO3sORDY=; b=b XGbnmR2UzJ6qHfafkWLnQZUc9gcxp53SeN5J7RZnUPjGV6gPP99rXvHWcj9vg2No e5hHjdUPcu+EjB1iwXshVbuOQqLmJsT86NRyoiCW0F5/31OjYDwrd1QsdYESqD4H cA0XKDgQQlg0ah8KofaAajjogBWFA+G7jnUluSZGnGsqDB/AMvXpihp+s66y7fT6 y0sVwU5mab7ov+SL99OveJ9V0PkGVM3B/FLJ4vaZHRv8kvC5NK4BFFpvS5YRlDId DUgSEyuSE8Bb+kmOddjICsf3JHthnZkvtRptuIM2EQhKR2gDUZrLaryzLMs/Smok XFKJsTOVgo1PwlpVM7O2A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdduieelkedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesthdtredttddtvd enucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghr nhepkeefudfggfeiueeiffehgfdvffejuddvhfdvieefledvjedthfdvheejhffgleeune cuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpth htohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhrvggvsghsugdqtghu rhhrvghnthesfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 10:52:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 15:52:32 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: is COMPAT_FREEBSD11 still required for riscv64, in order to build rustc? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.25 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.65)[-0.655]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.148:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:151847, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:AU]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4c8xjb50Crz3csS A while ago there was this thread: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-riscv/2024-September/000382.html is COMPAT_FREEBSD11 still needed in riscv64 on 15-PRERELEASE ? (not too sure where to ask about this. Please suggest a better-suited mailing list if there is one better, thanks) --