From nobody Sat Aug 23 22:37:39 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4c8X4s4mJDz64YfG for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4c8X4r6tzQz42kF; Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (124-18-6-240.area1c.commufa.jp [124.18.6.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.18.1/8.17.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 57NMbdUo049295; Sun, 24 Aug 2025 07:37:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dec.sakura.ne.jp; s=s2405; t=1755988660; bh=L7XEr+CZZZ4JxcnpPR15ICAIDK4IRY4VeGUoTG/4XDQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=IQbJ0M813usGDWz1pr7kLPDYx1r9ImoaqsRuS6M3IFYraqW55Uk+ocX1CdRXhRDmF 6EsCwRdu65QoKFZQ6JxhTU0Y1thH0eKCTsA9rNYTx/hKQ9532q4Ohp6rGjuFOoiPVL vjCoZnTgRQSAJOqlGquitPKUjiby5fVdv2+D/D2o= Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 07:37:39 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Cc: Graham Perrin , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf and /usr/local/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf (not repo names) Message-Id: <20250824073739.972b831b3278ff7e8f2f5bed@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <86jz2uvtt2.fsf@ltc.des.dev> References: <5dc99111-3977-4638-8151-1f69fa819e08@gmail.com> <20250823182819.321d4dbca45e56f7c1f0a7aa@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <93fa8633-3497-46db-9821-d5e57fd45ca8@gmail.com> <20250823213830.310f51c1c7d241dc3bc81963@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <86jz2uvtt2.fsf@ltc.des.dev> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.3) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4c8X4r6tzQz42kF On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 19:20:25 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Tomoaki AOKI writes: > > I think pkg is quite irregular corner case. > > Indeed, it SHALL be the part of base, but as it is still under active > > developement, need to be in ports "until the spec prolerly fixed up". > > So exists /usr/sbin/pkg for bootstrapping. > > I don't know where you got that idea. It's in ports because it's > closely tied to the ports tree and has a different lifecycle than base. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org I think you're right "until PkgBase is just under test". But now commits related with PkgBase is actively (than before) even on non-main branches like stable/14. An example below. https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?h=stable/14&id=d149be3a0cbe27599921b0952bd8de18413fceaf So it should be considered to be tied with base, too. The situation is already changed. This is my thought that made me to the conclusion. Regards. -- Tomoaki AOKI