Re: HEADS UP: MIT KRB5 1.22.1 Import
- Reply: Cy Schubert : "Re: HEADS UP: MIT KRB5 1.22.1 Import"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: HEADS UP: MIT KRB5 1.22.1 Import"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:27:50 UTC
In message <CANCZdfo9_D-D43JnoTxt1ivN_SZ2smpHQTJRL2oqp9q+YZEqfQ@mail.gmail.c om> , Warner Losh writes: > --0000000000004b0148063ce187a5 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:10=E2=80=AFAM Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.= > com> > wrote: > > > In message <aKcqsXIyYobdRIlY@nuc>, Mark Johnston writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 02:36:15AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > In message <86frdlkw30.fsf@ltc.des.dev>, > > =3D?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=3DC3=3DB8rgrav > > > ? > > > > =3D w > > > > rites: > > > > > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> writes: > > > > > > KRB5 1.22.0 released with a GSSAPI bug (CVE-2025-57736). The poin= > t > > patc > > > h=3D > > > > > =3D20 > > > > > > was applied on Aug 19 (f96110babbe1). 1.22.1 contains the point > > patch p > > > lu=3D > > > > > s=3D20 > > > > > > an additional GSSAPI patch. I intend to commit it to HEAD after a > > few d > > > ay=3D > > > > > s=3D20 > > > > > > of testing on Aug 25. > > > > > > > > > > Please post your patch for review (using git arc, as described in t= > he > > > > > committers guide) so others can test it too. > > > > > > > > git arc does not work with vendor merges. There is a way to trick it > > though > > > . > > > > > > What problem do you run into exactly? Could you provide a recipe for m= > e > > > to reproduce it locally? > > > > It's a vendor import. It's the same problem we have with git rebase and > > git > > diff of a vendor import. (This is why vendor imports use a special > > procedure [see committers guide].) > > > > I think you just need to tell arc to use the first parent.... That would be the commit hash in the vendor branch? commit dbbb504963792cabf7a2ef862dbb92b254f56782 (HEAD -> krb5-1221) Merge: 458ac2b6e445 e5fe63eaf1d3 Author: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 20 22:38:21 2025 -0700 Commit: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: Wed Aug 20 22:40:52 2025 -0700 krb5: Update to 1.22.1 Merge commit 'e5fe63eaf1d35ebbeac17eeed04cf873fbb9b3da' into main commit e5fe63eaf1d35ebbeac17eeed04cf873fbb9b3da (tag: vendor/krb5/1.22.1, freebsd/vendor/krb5, vendor/krb5) Author: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 20 22:22:31 2025 -0700 Commit: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: Wed Aug 20 22:22:47 2025 -0700 krb5: Import MIT 1.22.1 Security: CVE-2025-57736 Note that a git format-patch -2 doesn't include the e5fe63eaf1d35ebbeac17eeed04cf873fbb9b3da commit. I don't understand why the vendor commit no longer appears in history after the vendor branch merge has been pushed. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e**(i*pi)+1=0 > > I've created a generic patch and have created a revision with it. But it > > will not be used for the commit because it affects history. > > > > Warner >