Re: sshd-session (sshd on conect) crashes with signal 6
- In reply to: Kyle Evans : "Re: sshd-session (sshd on conect) crashes with signal 6"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 14:54:05 UTC
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:41:25AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: > ... > > However, I suspect that in the case (as for me) where (e.g.) sudo > > is built under stable/14, but one attempts to use it under head > > after main-n279619-9da2fe96ff2e will be "problematic," at best. > > > > I haven't really had enough coffee this morning, can you expand on your > concerns a little more, please? These changes introduced an entirely new > version of the syscalls and retained COMPAT14 versions so that, e.g., 14.x > jails should still do what they've always done. > > > (I just tested and confirmed that I was able to circumvent the problem > > in my case by augmenting the "sudoers" file "%wheel" group entry with a > > user-specific entry for me.) > > > > I think I'm missing some context, what problem is this referring to? > > > This may become a more pressing issue when folks start upgrading from > > 14 to 15. > .... From https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2025-August/008401.html | I also note that "sudo" claims my login isn't in sudoers; while that | is (technically) true, it has been thus for years: I'm using group | membership (in "wheel" -- as I have for decades), though "groups" | seems to detect the group membership OK. (I am not using jails. I have machines set up to boot from any of the 4 slices; slice 1 is presently stable/14; slice 4 is presently head. The file system where /usr/local resides remains the same, regardless of which slice is booted. Ports are built under stable/*. Yeah, it's "old school" -- been doing this way for about 25 years.) Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Of course firing the statistician will force the statistics to conform! See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.