Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))
- Reply: Steffen Nurpmeso : "Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))"
- Reply: Kyle Evans : "Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7"
- In reply to: Graham Perrin : "1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:23:02 UTC
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:38:24PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote:
> On 02/10/2024 14:19, dsdqmzk@hotmail.com wrote:
> > … (now) missing libmd.so.6. …
>
> <https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/commit/e3953c036f9d66c85b8e19f99f0710b3288ce5fb>
>
> > sys: Chase libmd version bump with a __FreeBSD_version bump ·
> > freebsd/freebsd-src@e3953c0
> .....
Thank you for that clue!
Booting a laptop to main-n272615-f5a04b16b189, then checking
/usr/local/libexec/Xorg built under stable/14:
g1-48(15.0-C)[11] ldd /usr/local/libexec/Xorg | grep found
libmd.so.6 => not found (0)
which would be why xdm stopped working under head as of yesterday (for
me)....
Hmmm... does this indicate that we are approaching a point where
creation (& maintenance) of a misc/compat14x port might be appropriate
(for those of us who (e.g.) might want to run ports under head that
were built under stable/14)?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org
Appeasement in 1938 did not bring peace in 1939.
What would appeasement bring now?
See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.