Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))
- Reply: Steffen Nurpmeso : "Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))"
- Reply: Kyle Evans : "Re: 1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7"
- In reply to: Graham Perrin : "1500024, libmd.so.6 and libmd.so.7 (was: FYI: make's "max_jobs" needs to be separated from -j (now?))"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:23:02 UTC
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:38:24PM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 02/10/2024 14:19, dsdqmzk@hotmail.com wrote: > > … (now) missing libmd.so.6. … > > <https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/commit/e3953c036f9d66c85b8e19f99f0710b3288ce5fb> > > > sys: Chase libmd version bump with a __FreeBSD_version bump · > > freebsd/freebsd-src@e3953c0 > ..... Thank you for that clue! Booting a laptop to main-n272615-f5a04b16b189, then checking /usr/local/libexec/Xorg built under stable/14: g1-48(15.0-C)[11] ldd /usr/local/libexec/Xorg | grep found libmd.so.6 => not found (0) which would be why xdm stopped working under head as of yesterday (for me).... Hmmm... does this indicate that we are approaching a point where creation (& maintenance) of a misc/compat14x port might be appropriate (for those of us who (e.g.) might want to run ports under head that were built under stable/14)? Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Appeasement in 1938 did not bring peace in 1939. What would appeasement bring now? See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.