Re: pkg server for current/arm64 stopped ? [main-armv7 on ampere2, . . .] [Update to Host OSVERSION 1500018 did not help]
- Reply: Philip Paeps : "Re: pkg server for current/arm64 stopped ? [main-armv7 on ampere2, . . .] [Update to Host OSVERSION 1500018 did not help]"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: pkg server for current/arm64 stopped ? [main-armv7 on ampere2, elapsed so far: 651:21:56]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 15:53:57 UTC
On Apr 29, 2024, at 20:16, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 29, 2024, at 20:11, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 29, 2024, at 19:54, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 28, 2024, at 18:06, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2024-04-18 23:14:22 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote: >>>>> On Apr 18, 2024, at 08:02, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> void <void_at_f-m.fm> wrote on >>>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:08:36 UTC : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure where to post this.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The last bulk build for arm64 appears to have happened around >>>>>>> mid-March on ampere2. Is it broken? >>>>>> >>>>>> main-armv7 building is broken and the last completed build >>>>>> was the one started on Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:32:10 GMT. It >>>>>> gets stuck making no progress until manually forced to stop, >>>>>> which leads to huge elapsed times for the incomplete builds: >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> >>>>>> My guess is that FreeBSD has something that broken after bd45bbe440 >>>>>> that was broken as of f5f08e41aa and was still broken at 75464941dc . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> One thing of possible note: >>>>> >>>>> Failing . . . >>>>> >>>>> Host OSVERSION: 1500006 >>>>> Jail OSVERSION: 1500014 >>>> >>>> I have finished a package builder refresh this morning. All our builder hosts (except PowerPC - I don't touch those) are now on main-n269671-feabaf8d5389 (OSVERSION 1500018). >>>> >>>> ampere1 successfully finished its 140releng-armv7-quarterly build, so it looks like the problem with stuck builds was limited to ampere2 building main-armv7. I'll keep a close eye on this one when it starts its next build. >>>> >>> >>> I see that main-armv7 started. >>> >>> It queued only 31935 instead of the prior 34528 (or more): it is doing an >>> incremental build instead of a full build. For example, pkg was not built >>> but instead the prior build is in use. Thus bad results from the prior >>> build might be involved in this new build. >>> >>> I'd recommend forcing a full "poudriere bulk -c -a" that does a from-scratch >>> build for the purposes of the main-armv7 test. >> >> Actually the test is not going to previde the information we are >> after as things are. >> >> giflib-5.2.2 failed to build, which leads to devel/doxygen being >> skipped. devel/doxygen was the first one to hang up in the prior >> 2 failing attempts, if I remember right. >> >> giflib-5.2.2 also causes graphics/graphviz to be skipped. >> graphics/graphviz was installed just before the hangup in all of >> the example hanups. So the context will not be replicated. >> >> We need graphics/giflib to build to actually do the test. > > Looks like: > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/graphics/giflib?id=5007109903fc271e3ef0ba01d78781c1fed99f3f > > is the fix for the graphic/giflib build failure. Well, main-armv7 is building again and things are still getting stuck. So much for my idea. For reference I list the over 10-hr-so-far ones: doxygen-1.9.6_1,2 build-depends 13:03:54 py39-pydot-2.0.0 run-depends 12:24:04 py39-pygraphviz-1.6 lib-depends 12:10:38 "ps -alxdww" would likely be appropriate to get a copy of the otuput of. "procstat -k -k" usage and the like on stuck processes would probably be appropriate. Does anyone with appropriate investigative background have login access to ampere2 to take a look at what is getting stuck? === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com